EverGantt vs Microsoft Project: the simpler, cheaper alternative

Published May 5, 2026 · Updated September 22, 2026

Short answer: If you’re a small team that mainly needs schedules, Gantt charts, dependencies, and a view of who’s overloaded, EverGantt does that in the browser on one flat-rate Team plan for the group, typically far less than Microsoft Project’s per-user plans, and with a gentler learning curve. If you need baselines, earned-value analysis, critical-path resource leveling, or enterprise portfolio management, Microsoft Project is still the more capable tool.

Microsoft Project has been the default project-management software for decades. It’s powerful, deep, and built for large organizations running formal project portfolios. That power is exactly why it’s overkill, and overpriced, for a five-person studio that just needs a plan everyone can see.

EverGantt vs Microsoft Project at a glance

Pricing as of May 2026. Check the current Microsoft Project pricing page for the latest.

For a team of 5 over a year, EverGantt’s Team plan covers all five people under one flat subscription (current pricing). Microsoft Project runs roughly $600/year on Plan 1 or $1,800/year on Plan 3, and there’s no free tier to start from.

Where Microsoft Project is genuinely better

Let’s be honest about what you give up. Microsoft Project earns its price for teams that actually use its depth:

• Baselines and earned-value analysis. Project can snapshot a plan and track planned-vs-actual cost and schedule variance. EverGantt doesn’t do EVA.
• Critical-path and resource leveling. Project’s scheduling engine can automatically level overallocated resources and compute the critical path across complex dependency networks.
• Enterprise portfolio management. Project Online / Project for the web ties into the Microsoft 365 ecosystem for cross-project portfolio reporting, governance, and timesheets.

If your organization runs formal, audited project portfolios, construction, government contracting, large IT programs, those features aren’t bloat. They’re the job.

Where EverGantt is better

For most small teams, the calculus flips:

• Cost. One flat-rate Team or Business subscription for the group (or $3.99/month for one person on Pro) versus $10–$55 per user. No seat minimums, no annual enterprise contract.
• Simplicity. You can build a real schedule in minutes instead of climbing Project’s learning curve. This is the 80% case: the handful of features small teams actually use.
• Real-time collaboration in the browser. On the Team and Business plans, several people edit the same plan at once and see changes live, no checking files in and out, nothing to install. Works on Mac and Windows.
• A free tier. Build, edit, and export charts before paying anything.

Which should you choose?

Choose Microsoft Project if you need baselines, earned-value reporting, automated resource leveling, or enterprise portfolio governance, and you have the budget and time to learn it.

Choose EverGantt if you’re a small team that wants a clear, shared schedule with dependencies and team capacity, kept current in real time, for a fraction of the cost. If you’ve ever felt like you’re paying too much for planning software, this is the gap EverGantt fills.

Start free in your browser, or see the full pricing.

More comparisons: EverGantt vs Asana · vs monday.com · vs TeamGantt · best free Gantt tools.